“The unexpected math behind Van Gogh’s “Starry Night”
On March 17, 2016 this happened …
This posting is a response to another blogger’s posted article about the Tribeca Film Festival’s choice to pull an anti-vaccination film from the TFF schedule. That poster not only chose to omit why Wakefield’s medical license was pulled (poster made like Wakefield’s license was merely misplaced), but also tried to falsely portray him as a wrongfully persecuted victim. The media did not strip Wakefield’s license (as the poster would like the readers to think), the medical community and PTB did -because Wakefield made up, lied about and falsified the links between MMR and autism -FOR PROFIT. The entire foundation of which Wakefield, the poster, et al, lay their argument upon is bogus, non-existent and fraudulent. That’s why the poster copied and pasted from The Guardian’s article while craftily avoiding the next line of –“Repeated studies involving more than a million children have found there is no evidence to link childhood vaccines to autism. But a small movement of activists persists in the belief that vaccinations might somehow harm children.“. The poster artfully lifted, word-for-word, everything but that line to deliberately keep the reader(s) misinformed/ in the dark while tagging the posting as “education”. smh
So, a big messy raspberry to you, “Blogger X”, for not only intentionally spreading misinformation and perpetuating a medical hoax but also for censoring while complaining about censorship.
…………………………………………………
Claude Robichaux March 27, 2016 at 12:11 pm Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Wakefield and Chatterjee can be criminally and/or critically keelhauled for their dubious practices and (as in the case of Chatterjee) absurd assertions (“40 Reasons …” -really? (“nice” ending too @@ lol). Wakefield’s medical license was yanked because he intentionally falsified data for the purpose of profit ( http://briandeer.com/mmr/lancet-summary.htm ). As for Dr Fletcher’s comments, there’s this: http://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2006/02/09/peter-fletcher-melanie-phillips-and-the-daily-mail-a-cracked-facade/ . My opinion is that TFF made the right choice and that neither side knows exactly what the the long term effects are therefore vaccinations should always be a choice, never mandatory.
If Sanders is the prime choice because more than a fuck is given about this country then it’d be the height of hypocrisy and irresponsibility to abandon the election just because Sanders might not/didn’t get the nomination.
I desperately want Sanders (no, not like that, don’t make Claude blush) too and it’s a crying shame that it’s more than most likely that he won’t get the nomination. So when the battle is over and the bridge comes – we need to cross it with a damn plan of action to win a war, not collapse in pouty heap of inaction that’ll only serve Drumpf & Co.
Vote Clinton, but keep the eye on the end game. Sanders broke ground like no one else before him. Letting Drumpf “win” not only undoes all that’s been accomplished in Obama’s two terms but it also obliterates all the progress Sanders made and how close he’s gotten our ideals into the W.H. and to fruition. If we plan on being around (or, returning from Canada @@) in 2020, we need to follow through now to keep things primed for then.
</rant>
ETA:. -if Sanders thinks he may not run in ’20, the squeeze should be put on John Stewart to run. (always hoped that was why he quit t.v.)
I really wish this wasn’t about asshat extraordinaire Hulk Hogan, then this would be truly a feel-good kind of ending where the right to privacy prevails. Gawker will appeal and most likely lose again -his junk in action is just not newsworthy, and that is the standard that Gawker needs to have met. Horrific visuals aside, that he’s been awarded 115 million is yet another vicious assault to the senses, the innocent and unsuspecting viewing public should have gotten that 115m to split.
You must be logged in to post a comment.